装修公司网站平台,营销自动化工具,hamo wordpress免登录,有别墅的件怎么写者支持向量机#xff1a;
超平面#xff1a;比数据空间少一个维度#xff0c;为了将数据进行切分#xff0c;分为不同的类别#xff0c;决策边界是超平面的一种
决策边界#xff1a;就是再二分类问题中#xff0c;找到一个超平面#xff0c;将数据分为两类#xff0c;最…支持向量机
超平面比数据空间少一个维度为了将数据进行切分分为不同的类别决策边界是超平面的一种
决策边界就是再二分类问题中找到一个超平面将数据分为两类最合适的超平面就叫做决策边界当现有的数据难以二分类需要对数据进行升维将数据映射到高一维度便于进行区分比如说二维平面难以区分就升维三维进行区分
需要用到的api在sklearn中需要用到的参数有linearpolysigmoidrbf
导包import sklearn.datasets as datasetsfrom sklearn.model_selection import train_test_splitfrom sklearn.metrics import f1_score#用来评价预测的结果准确率
需要对svc的参数kernel进行设置kernelrbfkernelpolykernellinearkernelsigmoid代表四种分类模式实现如下
from sklearn.svm import SVC
import sklearn.datasets as datasets
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import f1_score
dt datasets.load_breast_cancer()
# print(dt)
feature dt[data]
target dt[target]
x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test train_test_split(feature,target,train_size0.5,random_state2023)
# 建立不同方式的svc
s1 SVC(kernelrbf).fit(x_train,y_train)
s2 SVC(kernelpoly).fit(x_train,y_train)
s3 SVC(kernellinear).fit(x_train,y_train)
s4 SVC(kernelsigmoid).fit(x_train, y_train)
print(rbf的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s1.predict(x_test)))
print(poly的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s2.predict(x_test)))
print(linear的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s3.predict(x_test)))
print(sigmoid的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s4.predict(x_test)))输出结果
{data: array([[1.799e01, 1.038e01, 1.228e02, ..., 2.654e-01, 4.601e-01,1.189e-01],[2.057e01, 1.777e01, 1.329e02, ..., 1.860e-01, 2.750e-01,8.902e-02],[1.969e01, 2.125e01, 1.300e02, ..., 2.430e-01, 3.613e-01,8.758e-02],...,[1.660e01, 2.808e01, 1.083e02, ..., 1.418e-01, 2.218e-01,7.820e-02],[2.060e01, 2.933e01, 1.401e02, ..., 2.650e-01, 4.087e-01,1.240e-01],[7.760e00, 2.454e01, 4.792e01, ..., 0.000e00, 2.871e-01,7.039e-02]]), target: array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0,1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0,0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]), frame: None, target_names: array([malignant, benign], dtypeU9), DESCR: .. _breast_cancer_dataset:\n\nBreast cancer wisconsin (diagnostic) dataset\n--------------------------------------------\n\n**Data Set Characteristics:**\n\n :Number of Instances: 569\n\n :Number of Attributes: 30 numeric, predictive attributes and the class\n\n :Attribute Information:\n - radius (mean of distances from center to points on the perimeter)\n - texture (standard deviation of gray-scale values)\n - perimeter\n - area\n - smoothness (local variation in radius lengths)\n - compactness (perimeter^2 / area - 1.0)\n - concavity (severity of concave portions of the contour)\n - concave points (number of concave portions of the contour)\n - symmetry\n - fractal dimension (coastline approximation - 1)\n\n The mean, standard error, and worst or largest (mean of the three\n worst/largest values) of these features were computed for each image,\n resulting in 30 features. For instance, field 0 is Mean Radius, field\n 10 is Radius SE, field 20 is Worst Radius.\n\n - class:\n - WDBC-Malignant\n - WDBC-Benign\n\n :Summary Statistics:\n\n \n Min Max\n \n radius (mean): 6.981 28.11\n texture (mean): 9.71 39.28\n perimeter (mean): 43.79 188.5\n area (mean): 143.5 2501.0\n smoothness (mean): 0.053 0.163\n compactness (mean): 0.019 0.345\n concavity (mean): 0.0 0.427\n concave points (mean): 0.0 0.201\n symmetry (mean): 0.106 0.304\n fractal dimension (mean): 0.05 0.097\n radius (standard error): 0.112 2.873\n texture (standard error): 0.36 4.885\n perimeter (standard error): 0.757 21.98\n area (standard error): 6.802 542.2\n smoothness (standard error): 0.002 0.031\n compactness (standard error): 0.002 0.135\n concavity (standard error): 0.0 0.396\n concave points (standard error): 0.0 0.053\n symmetry (standard error): 0.008 0.079\n fractal dimension (standard error): 0.001 0.03\n radius (worst): 7.93 36.04\n texture (worst): 12.02 49.54\n perimeter (worst): 50.41 251.2\n area (worst): 185.2 4254.0\n smoothness (worst): 0.071 0.223\n compactness (worst): 0.027 1.058\n concavity (worst): 0.0 1.252\n concave points (worst): 0.0 0.291\n symmetry (worst): 0.156 0.664\n fractal dimension (worst): 0.055 0.208\n \n\n :Missing Attribute Values: None\n\n :Class Distribution: 212 - Malignant, 357 - Benign\n\n :Creator: Dr. William H. Wolberg, W. Nick Street, Olvi L. Mangasarian\n\n :Donor: Nick Street\n\n :Date: November, 1995\n\nThis is a copy of UCI ML Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) datasets.\nhttps://goo.gl/U2Uwz2\n\nFeatures are computed from a digitized image of a fine needle\naspirate (FNA) of a breast mass. They describe\ncharacteristics of the cell nuclei present in the image.\n\nSeparating plane described above was obtained using\nMultisurface Method-Tree (MSM-T) [K. P. Bennett, Decision Tree\nConstruction Via Linear Programming. Proceedings of the 4th\nMidwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Society,\npp. 97-101, 1992], a classification method which uses linear\nprogramming to construct a decision tree. Relevant features\nwere selected using an exhaustive search in the space of 1-4\nfeatures and 1-3 separating planes.\n\nThe actual linear program used to obtain the separating plane\nin the 3-dimensional space is that described in:\n[K. P. Bennett and O. L. Mangasarian: Robust Linear\nProgramming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets,\nOptimization Methods and Software 1, 1992, 23-34].\n\nThis database is also available through the UW CS ftp server:\n\nftp ftp.cs.wisc.edu\ncd math-prog/cpo-dataset/machine-learn/WDBC/\n\n.. topic:: References\n\n - W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg and O.L. Mangasarian. Nuclear feature extraction \n for breast tumor diagnosis. IST/SPIE 1993 International Symposium on \n Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, volume 1905, pages 861-870,\n San Jose, CA, 1993.\n - O.L. Mangasarian, W.N. Street and W.H. Wolberg. Breast cancer diagnosis and \n prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research, 43(4), pages 570-577, \n July-August 1995.\n - W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, and O.L. Mangasarian. Machine learning techniques\n to diagnose breast cancer from fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Letters 77 (1994) \n 163-171., feature_names: array([mean radius, mean texture, mean perimeter, mean area,mean smoothness, mean compactness, mean concavity,mean concave points, mean symmetry, mean fractal dimension,radius error, texture error, perimeter error, area error,smoothness error, compactness error, concavity error,concave points error, symmetry error,fractal dimension error, worst radius, worst texture,worst perimeter, worst area, worst smoothness,worst compactness, worst concavity, worst concave points,worst symmetry, worst fractal dimension], dtypeU23), filename: breast_cancer.csv, data_module: sklearn.datasets.data}
rbf的预测精度 0.9451697127937337
poly的预测精度 0.9405684754521964
linear的预测精度 0.9621621621621622
sigmoid的预测精度 0.5898123324396783Process finished with exit code 0得出sigmoid分类后结果很差
对数据进行处理归一化处理后在进行分类
from sklearn.svm import SVC
import sklearn.datasets as datasets
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import f1_score
from sklearn.preprocessing import MinMaxScaler
dt datasets.load_breast_cancer()
# print(dt)
feature dt[data]
target dt[target]
# x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test train_test_split(feature,target,train_size0.5,random_state2023)
# # 建立不同方式的svc
# s1 SVC(kernelrbf).fit(x_train,y_train)
# s2 SVC(kernelpoly).fit(x_train,y_train)
# s3 SVC(kernellinear).fit(x_train,y_train)
# s4 SVC(kernelsigmoid).fit(x_train, y_train)
# print(rbf的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s1.predict(x_test)))
# print(poly的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s2.predict(x_test)))
# print(linear的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s3.predict(x_test)))
# print(sigmoid的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s4.predict(x_test)))
MM MinMaxScaler()
n_feature MM.fit_transform(feature)
x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test train_test_split(n_feature,target,train_size0.5,random_state2023)
# 建立不同方式的svc
s1 SVC(kernelrbf).fit(x_train,y_train)
s2 SVC(kernelpoly).fit(x_train,y_train)
s3 SVC(kernellinear).fit(x_train,y_train)
s4 SVC(kernelsigmoid).fit(x_train, y_train)
print(rbf的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s1.predict(x_test)))
print(poly的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s2.predict(x_test)))
print(linear的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s3.predict(x_test)))
print(sigmoid的预测精度,f1_score(y_test, s4.predict(x_test)))输出结果
rbf的预测精度 0.9837837837837838
poly的预测精度 0.978494623655914
linear的预测精度 0.9814323607427056
sigmoid的预测精度 0.464864864864864我们会发现除了sigmoid都提升了准确性rbf不擅长处理数据分布不均匀的情况。
